Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21384

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : SR01 - SR05 Full Version

Varied Aetiologies and Outcome of Neonatal Cholestasis: A Series of Four Cases


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62840.18502
S Sivanandam, R Prabhu Vikash, R Balakrishnan, K Rajendren, TM Karthikeyan

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, KMCH Institute of Health Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, KMCH Institute of Health Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Consultant Neonatologist, Department of Paediatrics, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, KMCH Institute of Health Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, KMCH Institute of Health Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
S Sivanandam,
99A, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore-641014, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: susiva84@gmail.com

Abstract

Neonatal cholestasis is a significant cause of chronic liver disease in infants. However, lack of awareness among parents and primary care physicians often leads to delayed diagnosis and management of these children. In this series, the authors discussed four cases of neonatal cholestasis (48 days term female, 3 months term male, 73 days old female, 33 days old term male) that presented in the outpatient department with the chief complaint of yellowish discolouration of the eyes and pale-coloured stools. Clinical and histochemical findings in all cases were suggestive of neonatal cholestasis. The neonates were treated with Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA), vitamin ADEK, and followed-up. Fortunately, in all the babies, symptoms resolved after management, except for a three-month-old male baby who unfortunately succumbed to liver failure after two weeks of hospitalisation. Early identification of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) disorders is crucial as it enables effective management and potential definitive therapy. Additionally, prompt implementation of a galactose-free diet is critical for preventing acute toxicity and minimising tissue damage in galactosemia. Late presentation of biliary atresia can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is crucial to include stool and urine charts in the discharge summary of every newborn and provide parental education on recognising the signs of cholestasis in the Paediatric Outpatient department.

Keywords

Biliary atresia, Hyperbilirubinemia, Kasai procedure, Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Neonatal cholestasis is a common presenting feature of neonatal hepatobiliary dysfunction that affects normal biliary metabolism. Neonatal cholestasis is defined as conjugated hyperbilirubinemia occurring in newborns as a consequence of diminished bile flow. Cholestasis is categorised into biliary (obstructive, involving large extrahepatic or small intrahepatic bile ducts) or hepatocellular (resulting from defects in membrane transport, embryogenesis, or metabolic dysfunction) in origin (1). It should be suspected in any newborn who has jaundice, dark-coloured urine, or pale-coloured stool beyond the age of two weeks. Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia in a newborn is defined as a direct bilirubin level >1 mg/dL when the total bilirubin is less than 5 mg/dL or >20% of the total bilirubin if the total bilirubin is >5 mg/dL (2). The recent definition states that at any age, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia is pathological and requires evaluation using a stepwise evidence-based approach to arrive at a diagnosis (1). Early diagnosis and identification of the aetiology are essential, and appropriate medical support and nutritional supplementation can be lifesaving, while a delayed diagnosis can be detrimental.

Case Report

Case 1

A 48-day-old term female infant, the firstborn to non-consanguineous parents, was brought to the Paediatric Outpatient Department with yellowish discolouration of the eyes since day 3 of life. The baby was on direct breastfeeding and formula feeds since birth. The baby had been passing intermittent pale-coloured stools and normal urine. There was no significant antenatal history. On physical examination, the baby appeared icteric and had hepatomegaly (liver 3 cm below the right costal margin). During the evaluation for neonatal cholestasis, the baby was found to have conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with mildly elevated alkaline phosphatase and normal liver enzymes (Table/Fig 1).

Urine reducing substance was negative, serum ferritin was 520 ng/mL, and Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) was 10,850 ng/mL, which was normal for the age. Abdominal Ultrasonography (USG) revealed a partially distended gall bladder with no other significant abnormalities. Ophthalmology evaluation was normal. Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid testing revealed normal hepatocyte function and bilio-enteric drainage. Liver biopsy showed normal hepatic architecture, bile ducts, a normal cord pattern, mild inflammation with eosinophilic and mononuclear infiltrates in the portal tract. Cytoplasmic changes included panzonal feathery degeneration, more pronounced in Zone 3, with occasional giant cell transformation. Dilated sinusoids with hemosiderin-laden macrophages were seen, canaliculi were visualised, and cholestasis was noted (Table/Fig 2).

On immunohistochemistry, there was a complete loss of BSEP canalicular staining. The overall morphological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical features were consistent with PFIC type 2. Clinical exome sequencing revealed no pathogenic variants. The baby was started on UDCA (15 mg/kg/day) and vitamin A, D, E, K supplements (Vitamin A 5000 U/day, Vitamin D 1200 IU/day, Vitamin E 50 IU/kg/day, Vitamin K 5 mg per week orally) and continued for three months after the resolution of jaundice. The baby was followed-up until 11 months of age without any significant complications.

Case 2

A three-month-old term male baby, the secondborn to non-consanguineous parents, was brought to the paediatric OPD with yellowish discolouration of the eyes and passing pale-coloured stools since birth. The baby was on direct breastfeeding and formula feeds since birth. There was no significant antenatal history or family history. On physical examination, the baby appeared icteric and had hepatosplenomegaly. During the evaluation for neonatal cholestasis, the infant was found to have conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with elevated liver enzymes, with predominance of alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (Table/Fig 1).

Fasting abdominal Ultrasonography (USG) revealed hepatomegaly with increased echotexture, non-visualised intrahepatic biliary radicals and common bile duct at the porta hepatis region, and a prominent hepatic artery with non-visualised gall bladder, suggestive of biliary atresia. In the liver biopsy, hepatocytes showed panzonal feathery degeneration, and portal tracts showed inflammation, ductular proliferation, bile duct plugs, and portal-portal bridging fibrosis. The overall morphological and histochemical features were consistent with the diagnosis of biliary atresia (Table/Fig 3)a-d.

Unfortunately, this infant presented late to the healthcare facility due to a lack of awareness among parents. The baby succumbed to death due to liver failure after two weeks of hospitalisation.

Case 3

A 73-day-old term female infant, the firstborn to non-consanguineous parents, presented to the paediatric OPD with a history of yellowish discolouration of the eyes, pale-coloured stools, and dark yellow-coloured urine since one month. The baby was on direct breastfeeding and formula feeds since birth. There was no significant antenatal history or family history. On examination, the baby had icterus and hepatomegaly (liver 4 cm below the right costal margin). During the evaluation for neonatal cholestasis, the infant was found to have conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and elevated liver enzymes (Table/Fig 1). Urine reducing substances were negative, urine succinylacetone was not detected, and total bile acids were elevated at 305.7 μmol/L. Serum ferritin, TSH, and AFP were normal for age (serum ferritin was 846.3 ng/mL, TSH was 3.04 μIU/L, AFP was 23,710 ng/mL). Abdominal Ultrasonography (USG) and ophthalmology evaluation were normal. The liver biopsy revealed normal hepatic architecture, hepatocytes showed lobular inflammation and diffuse giant cell transformation, and portal tracts showed inflammation, ductular proliferation, and a few damaged bile ducts, which are features suggestive of giant cell hepatitis (Table/Fig 4). Clinical exome sequencing revealed a compound heterozygous variant involving the ABCB11 gene, suggestive of PFIC (Table/Fig 5). The baby was started on UDCA and vitamin A, D, E, K supplements, which were continued for four months after discharge. The infant is being followed-up periodically. It’s good to know that the patient’s Liver Function Tests (LFT) were within normal limits, despite experiencing pruritus during their last visit at 10 months of age. The management approach for their pruritus included the use of Hydroxyzine and UDCA.

Case 4

A 33-day-old term male infant, the firstborn to non-consanguineous parents, was noticed to have yellowish discolouration of the eyes, pigmented stools, and dark yellow-coloured urine since day 3 of life. The baby was on direct breastfeeding and formula feeds since birth. There was no significant antenatal or family history. The baby had recurrent hypoglycaemic seizures since day 3 of life, for which he was evaluated elsewhere and found to have conjugated hyperbilirubinemia. The baby was managed conservatively with intravenous fluids and UDCA. On day 31, the baby developed features of pneumonia and progressive deterioration of general condition, and hence was referred to our department. He was managed with oxygen therapy at 2 liters/min through nasal prongs and intravenous Cefotaxime at 100 mg/kg/day and Amikacin at 15 mg/kg/day for five days, which were stopped as the culture was found to be sterile. On examination, the baby had icterus and hepatomegaly (liver 4 cm). The baby was further evaluated for cholestasis. Routine biochemistry showed the presence of defective coagulation (PT 120 sec, INR >10) not corrected by vitamin K, elevated direct bilirubin, modest hypertransaminasemia (AST 238 U/L; ALT 128 U/L), low serum albumin, and a transient hyperammonemia (128 mcg/dL) (Table/Fig 1).

Urine reducing substances were negative, and urine succinylacetone was not detected. Total galactose and GALT enzyme were normal. Possibilities of GALD, mitochondrial hepatopathy, and inborn errors of metabolism were considered and evaluated. Minor salivary gland biopsy was normal, and abdominal Ultrasonography (USG) was normal. Urine ketones were not detected. Tandem mass spectrometry and urine gas chromatography mass spectrometry were normal. Ophthalmology evaluation revealed bilateral cataracts, and the baby was operated on for the same. Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with acute liver failure, bilateral cataracts, and hypoglycaemic seizures were suggestive of galactosemia, and lactose-free formula was started. However, clinical exome sequencing turned out to be normal. After five months, on follow-up, the baby was thriving well. Jaundice had resolved, and normalisation of biochemical values was noticed (serum bilirubin 0.10 mg/dL, direct bilirubin 0.05 mg/dL, SGPT 25 U/L, SGOT 39 U/L, ALP 264 U/L, serum albumin 4.6 g/dL, GGT 10 U/L, PT/INR 12/1).

Discussion

Earlier, idiopathic neonatal cholestasis was considered the most common cause, accounting for 30% of cases of neonatal cholestasis. The availability of genetic analysis for metabolic liver disorders has made the diagnosis more definite. Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia is defined as a direct bilirubin level >1 mg/dL when the total bilirubin is less than 5 mg/dL or >20% of the total bilirubin if the total bilirubin >5 mg/dL (1). The work-up profile of an infant with neonatal cholestasis must include complete liver function tests, thyroid function tests, and a sepsis screen, followed by specific biochemical, radiological, and histopathological tests (Table/Fig 6). Most infants with neonatal cholestasis are underweight and will need nutritional support. The goal is to provide adequate calories to compensate for steatorrhea and manage malnutrition. The calorie requirement is approximately 125% of the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) based on ideal body weight (3).

The incidence of neonatal cholestasis was found to be 1 in 2500 live births (1). There are two major categories: hepatocellular and obstructive. Hepatocellular dysfunction (infection, metabolic causes) accounts for 45-69% of all cases, while obstructive causes (biliary atresia and choledochal cyst) account for 19% to 55% (4). The most common cause is biliary atresia. In this case series, there was one child with biliary obstruction, and all others had hepatocellular dysfunction. Tyrosinemia, herpes simplex infection, hemochromatosis, and sepsis have to be considered in sick babies.

Liver function tests will help guide us to differentiate between hepatocellular and biliary cholestasis. If transaminases (SGOT and SGPT) are raised more, it is more likely hepatocellular aetiology. If alkaline phosphatase and GGT are raised more, then it is more probably biliary cholestasis.

Abdominal ultrasonography may provide findings suggestive of biliary atresia and can also be used to confirm other surgically treatable conditions like choledochal cyst and inspissated bile plug syndrome. Findings described in biliary atresia include the triangular cord sign, abnormal gallbladder morphology, or absence of the gallbladder. However, these findings cannot be reliably used to diagnose biliary atresia as they are neither highly sensitive nor specific (5),(6).

A HIDA scan presence of tracer in the duodenum rules out biliary atresia. But absence of tracer in the duodenum does not necessarily mean biliary atresia; it may indicate either bile duct obstruction or severe inability of the hepatocyte to secrete (7).

Liver biopsy is an essential investigation in the evaluation of neonatal cholestasis. Early recognition of Biliary Atresia (BA) by liver biopsy can avoid unnecessary laparotomy (2). The characteristic histopathological features of BA are bile duct proliferation, bile plugs in ducts, fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrates in the portal tracts, which were observed in presently discussed case 2. In several studies, it has been found that a diagnosis of biliary atresia was possible after liver biopsy in approximately 85-95% of patients (3),(8),(9). Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of BA (1),(4).

Biliary atresia needs to be considered and evaluated immediately in all non-sick newborns with neonatal cholestasis. The time of Kasai portoenterostomy surgery (within 60 days of age) and the expertise of the surgeon determine the outcome of biliary atresia (2). Hence, the earliest diagnosis is essential for timely management. A case series by Fontenele JPU et al., also highlights the importance of this unusual differential diagnosis in infants with a cholestatic syndrome (10).

Galactosemia should be ruled out in newborns with culture-proven sepsis because it is easily treatable. Galactosemia is usually the result of Galactose-1-phosphate Uridyl Transferase (GALT) deficiency. Affected infants present with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia after the introduction of human or cow’s milk (galactose-containing feedings). Associated features like sepsis, coagulopathy, hypoglycaemia, vomiting, diarrhoea, failure to thrive, and cataracts are also common. Early elimination of galactose from the diet may prevent further progression of galactosemia. The diagnosis is suggested by the presence of reducing substances in the urine and supported by GALT assay. Diagnosis is confirmed by genetics. Treatment requires galactose-free formula. In the present study, the fourth case presented with liver failure, cataract, and recurrent hypoglycaemia, and a probable diagnosis of galactosemia was made. The authors started the infant on lactose-free formula, and the infant improved dramatically. INR normalised over a period of time. In a case report by Nesrin C et al., a newborn with galactosemia and abnormal presentation has been presented (11). Mutational analysis of the GALT gene from Indian subjects has revealed heterogeneity in the structure of the gene and the presence of novel mutations (12),(13).

Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of unrelated monogenic disorders in which mutations in one of the genes involved in canalicular hepatobiliary transport result in progressive cholestasis and liver injury. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGTP) are considered markers for biliary cholestasis. GGTP is elevated in most cholestatic disorders; paradoxically low or normal levels are found in patients with PFIC 1,2 and disorders of bile acid synthesis (14). The presently discussed cases 1 and 3 have low GGT cholestasis. Case 3 had a ABCB11 gene involvement, which is a compound heterozygous variant suggestive of PFIC II, and the infant developed pruritus during follow-up. In infants with pruritus due to severe cholestasis, depending on severity and response to previous agents, an add-on drug can be considered in the following order: UDCA (20 mg/kg/d), rifampicin (5-10 mg/kg/d), naltrexone, and ondansetron (15). Surgical methods like partial internal biliary diversion and partial external biliary diversion may be effective in symptomatic children without decompensated cirrhosis in PFIC (16).

Conclusion

Early identification and appropriate evaluation of the cause of a medical condition or disease are indeed crucial for achieving a favourable outcome. It involves a combination of various diagnostic methods, including biochemical tests, imaging studies, and histopathology interpretation. India has made significant progress in establishing major centres equipped with the necessary infrastructure and personnel to conduct these investigations. The outcome of infants with cholestasis is adversely affected by malnutrition, hence adequate nutritional and vitamin supplements should be continued for atleast three months after the resolution of jaundice. Sick infants with suspected metabolic liver disorders and intriguing diagnosis require early dietary changes and appropriate monitoring for clinical improvement. Biliary atresia is still a challenging disease to diagnose. Any infant with cholestasis needs early identification and referral to appropriate centres, which remains the cornerstone of proper management.

References

1.
Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, Fischler B, Hadzic N, Mack CL, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: Joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2017;64(1):154-68. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Dani C, Pratesi S, Raimondi F, Romagnoli C, Task force for hyperbilirubinemia of the Italian Society of Neonatology. Italian guidelines for the management and treatment of neonatal cholestasis. Ital J Pediatr [Internet]. 2015;41(1):69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0178-7. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Suchy FJ, Sokol RJ. Medical and nutritional management of cholestasis in infants and children. In: Liver Disease in Children. Cambridge University Press; 2021. Pp. 116-46. [crossref]
4.
Bhatia V, Bavdekar A, Matthai J, Waikar Y, Sibal A. Management of neonatal cholestasis: Consensus statement of the Pediatric Gastroenterology Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Indian Pediatr [Internet]. 2014;51(3):203-10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0375-2. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Nievelstein RA, Robben SG, Blickman JG. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic imaging in children-techniques and an overview of nonneoplastic disease entities. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(1):55-75. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Mittal V, Saxena AK, Sodhi KS, Thapa BR, Rao KLN, Das A, et al. Role of abdominal sonography in the preoperative diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia in infants younger than 90 days. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2011;196(4):W438-45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5180. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kianifar HR, Tehranian S, Shojaei P, Adinehpoor Z, Sadeghi R, Kakhki VRD, et al. Accuracy of hepatobiliary scintigraphy for differentiation of neonatal hepatitis from biliary atresia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Pediatr Radiol [Internet]. 2013;43(8):905-19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2623-3. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Russo P, Magee JC, Boitnott J, Bove KE, Raghunathan T, Finegold M, et al. Design and validation of the biliary atresia research consortium histologic assessment system for cholestasis in infancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2011;9(4):357-62.e2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.01.003. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Russo P, Magee JC, Anders RA, Bove KE, Chung C, Cummings OW, et al. Key histopathologic features of liver biopsies that distinguish biliary atresia from other causes of infantile cholestasis and their correlation with outcome: A multicenter study. Am J Surg Pathol [Internet]. 2016;40(12):1601-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000755. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Fontenele JPU, Schenka AA, Hessel G, Jarry VM, Escanhoela CAF. Clinical and pathological challenges in the diagnosis of late-onset biliary atresia: Four case studies. Braz J Med Biol Res [Internet]. 2016;49(3):01-04. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20154808. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Nesrin C, Nihat D, Erdal P, Oguz T, Murat D, Kaan M. An unusual presentation of galactosemia in the newborn: Liver failure and hyperammonemia. Journal of Contraceptive Studies. 2016;1(3):01-03. Available at: https://contraceptivestudies.imedpub.com/an-unusual-presentation-of-galactosemia-in-the-newborn-liver-failure-and-hyperammonemia.php?aid=9091.
12.
Singh R, Thapa BR, Kaur G, Prasad R. Biochemical and molecular characterization of GALT gene from Indian galactosemia patients: Identification of 10 novel mutations and their structural and functional implications. Clin Chim Acta [Internet]. 2012;414:191-96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.017. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Singh R, Kaur G, Thapa BR, Prasad R, Kulkarni K. A case of classical galactosemia: Dentification and characterization of 3 distinct mutations in galactose-1- phosphate uridyl transferase (GALT) gene in a single family. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(7):874-76. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Amer S, Hajira A. A comprehensive review of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC): Genetic disorders of hepatocanalicular transporters. Gastroenterology Res [Internet]. 2014;7(2):39-43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr609e.[crossref][PubMed]
15.
Agarwal S, Lal BB, Rawat D, Rastogi A, Bharathy KGS, Alam S. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) in Indian children: Clinical spectrum and outcome. J Clin Exp Hepatol [Internet]. 2016;6(3):203-08. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2016.05.003. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sharma D, Shah UH, Sibal A, Chowdhary SK. Cholecystoappendicostomy for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Indian Pediatr [Internet]. 2010;47(7):626-28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-010-0122-2.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62840.18502

Date of Submission: Jan 12, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 19, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 17, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 15, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com